Today
I've been looking into various medical sector regulations and
directives, again with the intention of demonstrating that the EU is a
law taker, not a law maker. What we find is several strands of law, some
which are readily replicated on a global basis, others... not so much.
For instance when it comes to standardisation of codes, procedures,
equipment and terminology, it falls very much into the usual trade
dynamics, where there are several mutual recognition agreements with
countries around the world under the aegis of ISBT128. In that regard
there is a semi-functioning global single market.
When it comes
to ethics, practices, treatments and rights - fuhgeddaboudit! The
likelihood of an ethical convergence between the USA and anybody at all
is somewhere around nil. The Americans are staunch defenders of doing
things their way. It's not surprising TTIP has stalled as many times as
it has.
Meanwhile, the likelihood of convergence between Africa,
Europe and Arabia are also fairly slim. Even within Europe we find
several registered opt outs to global conventions and treaties. There
are guiding principles forged by the WHO which are not binding but very
much form the blueprint for new treaties.
Where rights are
concerned we find they arrive in Europe as Council of Europe treaties,
which is notationally intergovernmentalism. The Council of Europe is not
an EU institution. In such efforts to bring about ever more precise
human rights, we find than nation states can and do refuse to ratify
such agreements. At other times they will sign but have the right of reservation and may list procedural opt outs.
There is actually
nothing wrong with that in principle. Except of course that the EU is
its own legal entity at the Council of Europe and may also ratify such
treaties over the heads of member states. Thus while the non-signatories
are not bound by the treaty provisions, the EU is bound by them and the
EU makes directives to which the member states are bound - Another
example of the democracy by-pass. So you might ask, what's the
actual point of the Council of Europe ratification process if we end up
obeying anyway? The answer... none at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment